View submissions

Select filters to view submissions

Displaying 101 - 110 of 438
Number Name Submission Change type View
N17-001 Ms Debbie Burrows, Deputy Chair, Maungakiekie-Tamaki Local Board Objection Boundary

Ms Debbie Burrows, Deputy Chair, Maungakiekie-Tamaki Local Board


Objection

Maungakiekie
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Ms Debbie Burrows, Deputy Chair, Maungakiekie-Tamaki Local Board

I am IN SUPPORT of the Boundary Change. I am an Elected Member of the Local Board for Maungakiekie subdivision on the Maungakiekie Tamaki Local Board. I am Deputy Chair of Maungakiekie Tamaki Local Board.
1. I write in support of the proposed Maungakiekie electorate boundary changes in my personal capacity.
2. The 2019 proposed boundary changes largely reflect the Maungakiekie electorate boundary prior to the 2014 changes. All of Onehunga, One Tree Hill and Royal Oak (the suburbs in question) are historically connected to the current Maungakiekie electorate.
3. The Maungakiekie subdivision of the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board covers all of Onehunga, all of One Tree Hill and parts of Royal Oak. It is therefore appropriate for the electorate boundary to be of a similar nature as the areas share the same local issues.
4. Many Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board residents are confused to which ward boundary and electorate boundary they fall into. As some Onehunga and One Tree Hill residents fall into the Mt Roskill electorate, they believe they are part of a ‘Mt Roskill Ward’. Moving all of Onehunga and One Tree Hill into the Maungakiekie electorate would make it easier for residents to engage with both their ward and electorate activities.
5. Onehunga Mall is the heart of Onehunga and is the main road through the centre. It is currently split between the Mt Roskill electorate and the Maungakiekie electorate, which serves no purpose.
6. Manukau Road, Campbell Road, Onehunga Mall and Mt Smart Road are key arterial routes that Onehunga residents, One Tree Hill residents and Royal Oak residents use every day. These are the main roads that link our communities of interest and should be in one electorate boundary.
7. Many of the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board events, hosted by the Maungakiekie subdivision, are held in Onehunga and attract crowds from neighbouring suburbs, including Royal Oak, One Tree Hill and Epsom South. For example, the recent “Jellicoe Lights” Christmas event that was hosted by the Local Board and held in Jellicoe Park, involves Royal Oak schools and churches. It is one cohesive Royal Oak/Onehunga community of interest.
8. Residents of Royal Oak, Onehunga, Epsom South and One Tree Hill use common infrastructure. They shop locally at either the Onehunga Countdown or Royal Oak Pakn’Save, they enjoy the local parks, including Onehunga Bay Reserve, Cornwall Park, Jellicoe Park, and travel the local roads. Epsom South, Royal Oak and Onehunga are fundamentally one large community of interest.
9. I wish to be heard in person
N17-002 Tony Woodcock, Debbie Burrows and Don Allan Objection Boundary

Tony Woodcock, Debbie Burrows and Don Allan


Objection

Maungakiekie
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Tony Woodcock, Debbie Burrows and Don Allan

1. We write in support of the proposed Maungakiekie electorate boundary changes in our personal capacity, while referencing our roles as Deputy Chair and members of the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board.
2. The 2019 proposed boundary changes largely reflect the Maungakiekie electorate boundary prior to the 2014 changes. All of Onehunga, One Tree Hill and Royal Oak (the suburbs in question) are historically connected to the current Maungakiekie electorate.
3. The Maungakiekie subdivision of the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board covers all of Onehunga, all of One Tree Hill and parts of Royal Oak. It is therefore appropriate for the electorate boundary to be of a similar nature as the areas share the same local issues.
4. Many Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board residents are confused to which ward boundary and electorate boundary they fall into. As some Onehunga and One Tree Hill residents fall into the Mt Roskill electorate, they believe they are part of a ‘Mt Roskill Ward’. Moving all of Onehunga and One Tree Hill into the Maungakiekie electorate would make it easier for residents to engage with both their ward and electorate activities.
5. Onehunga Mall is the heart of Onehunga and is the main road through the centre. It is currently split between the Mt Roskill electorate and the Maungakiekie electorate, which serves no purpose.
6. Manukau Road, Campbell Road, Onehunga Mall and Mt Smart Road are key arterial routes that Onehunga residents, One Tree Hill residents and Royal Oak residents use every day. These are the main roads that link our communities of interest and should be in one electorate boundary.
7. Many of the Maungakiekie-Tāmaki Local Board events, hosted by the Maungakiekie subdivision, are held in Onehunga and attract crowds from neighbouring suburbs, including Royal Oak, One Tree Hill and Epsom South. For example, the recent “Jellicoe Lights” Christmas event that was hosted by the Local Board and held in Jellicoe Park, involves Royal Oak schools and churches. It is one cohesive Royal Oak/Onehunga community of interest.
8. Residents of Royal Oak, Onehunga, Epsom South and One Tree Hill use common infrastructure. They shop locally at either the Onehunga Countdown or Royal Oak Pakn’Save, they enjoy the local parks, including Onehunga Bay Reserve, Cornwall Park, Jellicoe Park, and travel the local roads. Epsom South, Royal Oak and Onehunga are fundamentally one large community of interest.
9. We wish to be heard in person
N17-003 Mr Josh Bardell Objection Boundary

Mr Josh Bardell


Objection

Maungakiekie
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mr Josh Bardell

All of Otahuhu should be served by one Member of Parliament, and for this reason I write in support of the proposed boundary changes.
The northern part of Otahuhu should be with the rest of Otahuhu that currently sits in the Manukau East electorate. The current boundary splits Otahuhu in two and therefore separates a community of interest. This must change- Otahuhu should be brought back together.
Students at schools such as Panama Road School, Otahuhu Intermediate, Mt Richmond School and Otahuhu School currently live in two separate electorates from their school. All of Otahuhu should be in Manukau East so the schooling community in this area are in the same electorate represented by one MP.
N17-004 Stephen Lasham Objection Boundary

Stephen Lasham


Objection

Maungakiekie
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Stephen Lasham

I am writing to show my support for the Maungakiekie Boundary change proposed in the Electorate boundary review for which submissions are due 20th December 2019.
I am concerned that your website only provides a form for objections meaning you will get a one sided view of the peoples’ opinions regarding the proposal.
I support the inclusion of the area of Mt Roskill highlighted on the proposed boundary map. Trafalgar Street has always seemed an inappropriate boundary, as we use Royal Oak Mall regularly, and we have schools the other side of the boundary that are clearly associated with Onehunga but are not within our Boundary.
I am a leader of the Onehunga Sea Scouts and have been so for the past 12 years. Many of our Scouts have come from the area across the boundary line, and from this perspective I also believe the boundary line is incorrect as it currently stands, so from the perspective of Aotea Sea Scouts I also support this change.
The Trafalgar Street cut-off has made a divide in the community for too long and should be rectified by this change.
I also support the reduction of the Maungakiekie boundary to the East of the Northern/Southern Motorway. In the long term I believe this should also change our local ward boundary, which for the Maungakiekie Tamaki Local Board, sees a bias in Local Board members to the Tamaki Subdivision compared to the Maungakiekie Subdivision. I would even go as far as to suggest that the Motorway would make a more logical divide line since populations on either side are effectively cut in two by the motorway. I believe Auckland Council should also be directed to adjust their local board boundaries as part of this review to enable a fair representation for the Maungakiekie Subdivision.
Please accept this submission of support for the proposed boundary changes.
N17-005 Onehunga Community Patrol Objection Boundary

Onehunga Community Patrol


Objection

Maungakiekie
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Onehunga Community Patrol

This is not an objection, the Onehunga Community Patrol supports the proposed boundary changes to the Maungakiekie Electorate.
The Onehunga Community Patrol covers all of Onehunga, Royal Oak and One Tree Hill. These suburbs share a similar interest in community safety and we chose to make them our patrol area due to the obvious geographic boundary.
Onehunga Community Patrol has the support of the Onehunga Policing unit and has a Police Liason Officer who is based at the Onehunga Station. The Onehunga Policing unit also covers all of Onehunga, Royal Oak and One Tree Hill. It is appropriate that this community of safety interest is in the Maungakiekie Electorate as it has no connection with Mt Roskill.
We also receive sponsored petrol for our patrol car from Royal Oak Z Energy station. This is a another example of the connection between Onehunga, Royal Oak and One Tree Hill.
We therefore request that the proposed boundary changes go ahead.
N17-006 Cornwall Park Trust Board Objection Boundary

Cornwall Park Trust Board


Objection

Maungakiekie
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Cornwall Park Trust Board

I am making this submission on behalf of the Cornwall Park Trust Board.
Cornwall Park does not wish to present this submission to the Representation Committee in person.
This submission relates to a proposed boundary change. The proposed electorate of this submission relates to the Maungakiekie electorate.
Cornwall Park Trust wishes to support the proposed changes to the boundary of the Maungakiekie electorate for the following reasons.
Maungakiekie is the Maori name for One Tree Hill, which is the maunga at the heart of the Maungakiekie electorate.
It is appropriate that all surrounding suburbs at the base of the maunga and Cornwall Park are in one electorate. These suburbs include One Tree Hill, Royal Oak and Epsom South. They represent one large community of interest that use the park for leisure and enjoy the local activities hosted in the park.
The whole area of Onehunga and Royal Oak has a strong affinity for and around One Tree Hill. As such the area should remain in a single cohesive unit.
The Cornwall Park Trust owns a number of propoerties along Campbell Road, which is a road that is currently split between the Mt Roskill and Maungakiekie electorates. Campbell Road should be brought back into the Maungakiekie electorate, so a traditional One Tree Hill community does not remain divided.
Cornwall Park Trust seeks that the proposed boundary changes to the Maungakiekie electorate be confirmed.
N17-007 Mr Steve McAneney Objection Boundary

Mr Steve McAneney


Objection

Maungakiekie
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mr Steve McAneney

I don’t object. I love it! Why only give the objectors a chance to have their say?

Suggested solution

Go for it. Great initiative!
N17-008 Onehunga Fencible & Historical Society Inc. Objection Boundary

Onehunga Fencible & Historical Society Inc.


Objection

Maungakiekie
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Onehunga Fencible & Historical Society Inc.

Ours is not an objection as it changes a fault and brings Onehunga into one electorate.
1. From a heritage perspective, it is appropriate that all of Onehunga which is one cohesive heritage area, is part of one cohesive electorate.
2. Onehunga, as one community of interest, would greatly benefit from the representation of one MP, particularly with upcoming high-density development in the area. In the midst of this development, it is very important that Onehunga has one MP voice that keeps Onehunga's heritage and character intact.
N17-009 Mr Bradyn Watson Objection Name

Mr Bradyn Watson


Objection

Maungakiekie
This objection does not relate to a boundary change
This objection relates to a name change

Mr Bradyn Watson

I would like to support the boundary changes proposed for the Maungakiekie electorate.
Panmure does not share a community of interest with Ellerslie and One Tree Hill. The railway line in Mt Wellington acts as a natural boundary line that separates the proposed Maungakiekie electorate to the proposed Manukau East.

Suggested solution

The new proposed Manukau East electorate must, however, have a name change to “Panmure”. The new proposed Manukau East boundary resembles the old Panmure electorate from 1984-96, as such there is a historical tie to this name AND it is a more accurate representation of the new geographic area.
N19-001 Mr S Kumar Objection Boundary

Mr S Kumar


Objection

Botany
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mr S Kumar

Our current address is officially in Flat Bush, but would remain in the Botany electorate. It would make sense for us (and the whole 2016 post code block) to be part of the new Flat Bush electorate, as (among other things) we are in zone for Ormiston/Mission Height schools which are geographically in the Flat Bush electorate, not Botany.

Suggested solution

Include all street addresses between Ormiston and Botany that are officially part of the Flat Bush suburb (i.e. post code 2016) in the Flat Bush electorate.
Back to top