Displaying
171 - 200 of
438
Number | Name | Submission | Change type | View |
---|---|---|---|---|
N20-061 | Island Child Charitable Trust | Objection | Boundary, name | |
Island Child Charitable TrustObjection
Manukau East
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection relates to a name change
Island Child Charitable TrustMaungakiekie electorate is named after our Maunga. We feel we have no affiliation to Manukau East. We are based in Glen Innes and we feel it will cause trauma amongst our community to be so different to local board boundaries.Suggested solutionMaintain Maungakiekie from Maybury Street to the Panmure Bridge. Do not rename the area Manukau East. |
||||
N20-062 | Andrew McVey | Objection | Name | |
Andrew McVeyObjection
Manukau East
This objection does not relate to a boundary change
This objection relates to a name change
Andrew McVeyI live in Point England. Along with Panmure and Glen Innes, Point England is now in Manukau East. The name is very confusing. These suburbs are north of Manukau. Also, these suburbs have never historically been part of Manukau. It appears that Manukau centre is also not part of the electorate.Please consider renaming this electorate in an inclusive way. Voter participation depends on people understanding what electorate they are in. This name will not help. Suggested solutionIsthmus East, or Eastern Isthmus. This is geographically correct as most of the new electorate forms the eastern part of the Auckland isthmus, down to the portage of the Tamaki Strait and the Manukau Harbour. |
||||
N20-063 | David Hoggard | Objection | Name | |
David HoggardObjection
Manukau East
This objection does not relate to a boundary change
This objection relates to a name change
David HoggardThe Manukau East name is inappropriate as a large part of the electorate is not in Manukau. The boundary changes are substantial enough to justify changing the name.Suggested solutionRename the seat as Ōtāhuhu. Not only will this make the name fully Te Reo Māori as opposed to only partly, it also reflects the fact that Ōtāhuhu is now the central focal point of the electorate. Additionally, the name has been used historically for an electorate covering a similar area, most recently in the 1970s and 80s. |
||||
N20-064 | Patrick Downey | Objection | Name | |
Patrick DowneyObjection
Manukau East
This objection does not relate to a boundary change
This objection relates to a name change
Patrick DowneyManukau East does not accurately define the significant area of East Auckland to be added to the proposed boundary. Also, geographically the proposed elongated boundary from Point England to Papatoetoe is separated by the Waipuna Basin and this creates a natural physical and possibly psychological divide.Suggested solutionIf this area is to be merged, a common landmark such as the Tamaki Estuary, should be considered as a uniting name. Therefore, I propose Ngutuawa/Estuary as a more suitable name rather than the misleading and provocative Manukau East. |
||||
N20-601 | Mrs Tania Batucan | Counter-Objection | Name | |
Mrs Tania BatucanCounter-Objection
Manukau East
Relates to objectionsN20-001, N20-002, N20-005, N20-006, N20-007, N20-009, N20-010, N20-013, N20-014, N20-016, N20-018, N20-019, N20-020, N20-021, N20-022, N20-023, N20-024, N20-029, N20-030, N20-037, N20-038, N20-039, N20-040, N20-041, N20-043, N20-045, N20-046, N20-047, N20-048, N20-049, N20-050, N20-051, N20-052, N20-053 , N20-055, N20-057, N20-058, N20-059, N20-061
This objection does not relate to a boundary change
This objection relates to a name change
Mrs Tania BatucanThe argument that Panmure doesn't identify with South Auckland suburbs is resolved by changing the proposed Manukau East electorate name to a name that reflects the communities in the new boundary. Mt Wellington Railway Line also forms a natural boundary.Suggested solutionrename the new Manukau East electorate |
||||
N20-602 | Mrs Tania Batucan | Counter-Objection | Name | |
Mrs Tania BatucanCounter-Objection
Manukau East
Relates to objectionsN20-032 , N20-061, N20-029, N20-062, N20-013, N20-051, N20-043, N20-048, N20-005, N20-014, N20-015, N20-016, N20-018, N20-020, N20-021, N20-022, N20-023, N20-026, N20-024, N20-063, N20-030, N20-031, N20-001, N20-056, N20-002, N20-035, N20-038, N20-039, N20-040, N20-041, N20-004, N20-058, N20-059, N20-045, N20-046, N20-049, N20-047, N20-050, N20-052, N20-007, N20-008, N20-055, N20-057, N20-027, N20-010
This objection does not relate to a boundary change
This objection relates to a name change
Mrs Tania BatucanThe argument that Panmure has no history or common interest with Manukau East is resolved changing the proposed Manukau East electorate name to a name that reflects the communities in the new boundary. These could be: "Otahuhu" which is the middle joining suburb between the original Manukau East communities and the proposed new ones; "Portage" which represents the famous Portage Crossing that is in the proposed Manukau East electorate and was historically used by Maori between the two harbours; or "Tauoma" which is the name of the particular Portage Crossing as previously mentioned. Mt Wellington Railway Line also forms a natural boundary.Suggested solutionrename the new Manukau East electorate |
||||
N20-603 | Mrs Tania Batucan | Counter-Objection | Boundary | |
Mrs Tania BatucanCounter-Objection
Manukau East
Relates to objectionsN20-003
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Mrs Tania BatucanLabour's map separates Mt Wellington and worse, it's according to random mesh-blocks rather than communities of interest. Their map cuts along Penrose Road and creates an awkward boundary in and out of side streets off Penrose Road. Several streets, including Penrose Road, Panorama, Mt Wellington Highway and Barrack Road are split and will be in two different electorates. That will include myself and my family. At the top of my street I will be in Manukau East (we have absolutely no connection with Manukau East) and the bottom of my street will be in Maungakiekie. The better solution is separating the proposed Maungakiekie and Manukau East electorates along the Mt Wellington rail line as originally proposed. Labour's proposal also splits Mt Wellington from its maunga. As a longtime Mt Wellington resident, I know our community has not historically been separated from our maunga, unlike Panmure and Point England.Suggested solutionKeep the boundary line as the Mt Wellington Railway line, which acts as a natural boundary. |
||||
N20-604 | Ms Bevan Chuang | Counter-Objection | Boundary | |
Ms Bevan ChuangCounter-Objection
Manukau East
Relates to objectionsN20-003
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Ms Bevan ChuangLabour's suggested boundary splits Mt Wellington. Their map cuts along Penrose Road and moves in and out of side streets, cutting multiple streets in half according to random mesh-blocks, it is confusing for residents. The more straight-forward solution is separating the proposed Maungakiekie and Manukau East electorates along the rail line as per the Commission’s draft. This line acts as a natural boundary.Suggested solutionKeep the boundary line as the Mt Wellington Railway line, which acts as a natural boundary. |
||||
N20-605 | Ms Bevan Chuang | Counter-Objection | Name | |
Ms Bevan ChuangCounter-Objection
Manukau East
Relates to objectionsN20-032 , N20-061, N20-029, N20-062, N20-013, N20-051, N20-043, N20-048, N20-005, N20-014, N20-015, N20-016, N20-019, N20-018, N20-020, N20-021, N20-022, N20-023, N20-026, N20-024, N20-063, N20-030, N20-031, N20-001, N20-056, N20-002, N20-035, N20-038, N20-039, N20-040, N20-041, N20-058, N20-059, N20-045, N20-046, N20-049, N20-047, N20-050, N20-052, N20-007, N20-008, N20-055, N20-057, N20-027, N20-010, N20-009
This objection does not relate to a boundary change
This objection relates to a name change
Ms Bevan ChuangThe argument that Panmure has no history or common interest with Manukau East is resolved changing the proposed Manukau East electorate name to a name that reflects the communities in the new boundary. These could be: "Portage" which represents the famous Portage Crossing that is in the proposed Manukau East electorate and was historically used by Maori between the two harbours; "Otahuhu" which is the middle joining suburb between the original Manukau East communities and the proposed new ones; or Panmure-Otara. Mt Wellington Railway Line also forms a natural boundary.Suggested solutionrename the new Manukau East electorate |
||||
N20-606 | Ms Bevan Chuang | Counter-Objection | Boundary | |
Ms Bevan ChuangCounter-Objection
Manukau East
Relates to objectionsN20-001, N20-002, N20-009, N20-010, N20-011, N20-016, N20-020, N20-023, N20-026, N20-029, N20-030, N20-034, N20-036, N20-039, N20-040, N20-041, N20-043, N20-045, N20-046, N20-047, N20-048, N20-049, N20-051, N20-055
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Ms Bevan ChuangThere are several examples where a community’s main train station is in a different electorate to the one they reside in. One example is the Otahuhu Train Station, which is in the current Mangere electorate (Otahuhu is currently split between Maungakiekie and Manukau East). Mt Wellington Railway line also forms a natural boundary between the proposed Manukau East and Maungakiekie electorates. |
||||
N20-607 | Ms Bevan Chuang | Counter-Objection | Boundary | |
Ms Bevan ChuangCounter-Objection
Manukau East
Relates to objectionsN20-006, N20-007, N20-009, N20-033, N20-036, N20-037, N20-038, N20-047
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Ms Bevan ChuangThe Tamaki Estuary does extend all the way down to Otahuhu and I note parts of Manukau East currently includes the Estuary. |
||||
N20-608 | Ms Bevan Chuang | Counter-Objection | Boundary | |
Ms Bevan ChuangCounter-Objection
Manukau East
Relates to objectionsN20-002, N20-005, N20-007, N20-009, N20-014, N20-020, N20-026, N20-028, N20-030, N20-034, N20-039, N20-040, N20-041, N20-043, N20-045, N20-046, N20-049, N20-051, N20-055, N20-059, N20-062
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Ms Bevan ChuangThe claim that Panmure will not be properly represented and its issues not listened to cannot be possibly made as representation is determined by the elected MP for the new seat. There is no telling where that new MP will decide to locate their office or what sort of representative that member of parliament will be |
||||
N20-609 | Debbie Burrows | Counter-Objection | Name | |
Debbie BurrowsCounter-Objection
Manukau East
Relates to objectionsN20-003
This objection does not relate to a boundary change
This objection relates to a name change
Debbie BurrowsThe electorate name is Maungakiekie (One Tree Hill). This could perhaps denote that greater precedence and unity is needed for the western end. The eastern end of the Commission’s proposed electorate has greater capacity to change. Labour need to reconcile that some suburbs have to be lost in Maungakiekie to cater for the change in population. |
||||
N20-610 | Debbie Burrows | Counter-Objection | Boundary | |
Debbie BurrowsCounter-Objection
Manukau East
Relates to objectionsN20-001, N20-005, N20-007, N20-009, N20-010, N20-011, N20-015, N20-016, N20-020, N20-023, N20-026, N20-028, N20-029, N20-030, N20-039, N20-040, N20-041, N20-042, N20-043, N20-044, N20-045, N20-046, N20-049, N20-050, N20-051, N20-052, N20-055, N20-058
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Debbie BurrowsSubmissions that reference TRC and it's change in population/connection to Panmure.Similar large-scale developments to TRC are also occurring in the Maungakiekie suburbs of Oranga and Onehunga. These developments by Kainga Ora will also see additional population increases, so the proposed Maungakiekie electorate cannot have three major population increasing developments when the purpose of boundary reviews is to make sure electorates are proportional. Note, not only an issue for Panmure, there’s large-scale developments all over Auckland you cannot hold up boundary changes because of current developments, because then changes based on population will never occur. |
||||
N20-611 | Debbie Burrows | Counter-Objection | Boundary | |
Debbie BurrowsCounter-Objection
Manukau East
Relates to objectionsN20-008, N20-009, N20-016, N20-017
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Debbie BurrowsThe boundary change is not based on socio-economics and gerrymandering, but on population sized according to the latest census. The Representation Commission is the independent body that is made up of public officials and Government and Opposition appointees. Therefore the recommendations by the Representation Commission are fair and proportionate. |
||||
N20-612 | Debbie Burrows | Counter-Objection | Boundary | |
Debbie BurrowsCounter-Objection
Manukau East
Relates to objectionsN20-002, N20-005, N20-007, N20-009, N20-014, N20-020, N20-026, N20-028, N20-030, N20-034, N20-039, N20-040, N20-041, N20-043, N20-045, N20-046, N20-049, N20-051, N20-055, N20-059, N20-062
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Debbie BurrowsSubmissions that reference Panmure will not be properly represented in the new electorate.The claim that Panmure will not be properly represented and its issues not listened to cannot be possibly made. Representation is determined by the elected MP for the new seat, and there is no telling at this point in time where that new MP will decide to locate their office or what sort of representative member of parliament they will be. |
||||
N20-613 | Mr Murray Hawkins | Counter-Objection | Boundary | |
Mr Murray HawkinsCounter-Objection
Manukau East
Relates to objectionsN20-005
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Mr Murray HawkinsMyself being of Maori descent our community is our home.I have resided in Mount Wellington for over 25 years. We have had several boundary changes over the year. Just leave us be. Nothing against Manukau East electorates but Mount Wellington has no community of interest with these suburbs. Historically Mount Welington has more common relationship Panmure, Penrose, Point England and Ellerslie as its natural neighbours and where we have common interests in sharing sport facilities. 2. The submission boundary map moves in and out of streets off Penrose rather than sticking to a clean-cut boundary line like the Mt Wellington Rail Line. The separating communities of interest. Mt Wellington will be split from our maunga (Maungarei). Suggested solutionIf there is to being a boundary changes and following communities of interest. Namely, Glen Innes, Tamaki, Panmure, Mt Wellington, Penrose, Sylvia and Ellerslie. This electorate should be called Maungarei (Maori name for Mt Wellington) as this is our mountain we look to for community strength. |
||||
N20-614 | Sunny Kaushal | Counter-Objection | Boundary | |
Sunny KaushalCounter-Objection
Manukau East
Relates to objectionsN20-001, N20-002, N20-003, N20-009, N20-010, N20-011, N20-016, N20-020, N20-023, N20-026, N20-029, N20-030, N20-034, N20-036, N20-039, N20-040, N20-041, N20-043, N20-045, N20-046, N20-047, N20-048, N20-049, N20-051, N20-052, N20-055, N20-058, N20-064
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Sunny KaushalCounter-submission (1): Labour Party Counter-Submission N20-003Objection and reason: Labour's suggested boundary splits Mt Wellington. Their map cuts along Penrose Road and moves in and out of side streets, cutting multiple streets in half (between two different electorates) according to random mesh-blocks rather than communities of interest. These streets include: Penrose Road, Panorama Road, Barrack Road, Mt Wellington Highway. The more straight-forward solution is separating the proposed Maungakiekie and Manukau East electorates along the rail line as per the Commission’s draft. This line acts as a natural boundary. Mt Wellington has historically been in the Maungakiekie electorate, unlike Panmure and Point England. Counter-submission (2): submissions that reference the separation of the Panmure train station from the Panmure community. Objection and reason: Object to the notion that Panmure will be separated from it's train station and therefore should not be subject to change. There are several examples where a community’s main train station/transport hub is in a different electorate to the one they reside in. One example includes Otahuhu Train Station, which is in the current Mangere electorate (Otahuhu is currently split between Maungakiekie and Manukau East). Counter-submission (3): submissions that reference the new Manukau East electorate's shape is impractical Objection and Reason: The claim that the new Manukau East electorate is impractical because of its shape is irrelevant. Many electorates come in various shapes and sizes as they are based on population numbers i.e. proposed North Shore electorate (approx. 12-14km) from Mairangi Bay down to Devonport. This new electorate also has a basin in the middle like the proposed Manukau East electorate. Proportionate electorates is the utmost important factor - not the shape of the new electorate. Suggested solutionSolution: Keep the boundary line as the Mt Wellington Railway line, which acts as a natural boundary. |
||||
N20-615 | Mr Shiu Narayan | Counter-Objection | Boundary | |
Mr Shiu NarayanCounter-Objection
Manukau East
Relates to objectionsN20-003
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Mr Shiu NarayanLabour's suggested boundary splits Mt Wellington. Their map cuts along Penrose Road and neighbouring streets, which would be split in half between two different electorates (Penrose Road, Panorama Road, Barrack Road, Mt Wellington Highway). The better solution is keeping the rail line as the natural boundary as per the Commission’s draft. I've lived in Mt Wellington for over 12 years and have never identified with Manukau East. We have always been part of the Mt Wellington community and Maungakiekie electorate. It's absurd that Labour wants to divide our community the way they have suggested. I'm part of the Mt Wellington Residents Association and other Mt Wellington social/sporting clubs and dividing our suburb would cause great difficulty in how our clubs/groups interact with the wider community.Suggested solutionKeep the boundary line as the Mt Wellington Railway line, which acts as a natural boundary. |
||||
N20-616 | Mr Shiu Narayan | Counter-Objection | Boundary, name | |
Mr Shiu NarayanCounter-Objection
Manukau East
Relates to objectionsN20-032 , N20-061, N20-029, N20-062, N20-013, N20-051, N20-043, N20-048, N20-005, N20-014, N20-015, N20-016, N20-019, N20-018, N20-020, N20-021, N20-022, N20-023, N20-026, N20-024, N20-063, N20-030, N20-031, N20-001, N20-056, N20-002, N20-035, N20-038, N20-039, N20-040, N20-041, N20-004, N20-058, N20-059, N20-045, N20-046, N20-049, N20-047, N20-050, N20-052, N20-007, N20-008, N20-055, N20-057, N20-027, N20-010, N20-009
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection relates to a name change
Mr Shiu NarayanChange the proposed Manukau East electorate name to one that reflects the communities in the new boundary i.e. "Panmure-Otahuhu", or a name that references/relates to the Tamaki Estuary as this Estuary holds significance to the communities in the new Manukau East electorate. Renaming is a way all communities will have an identity in the new area.Suggested solutionRename the new Manukau East electorate. |
||||
N20-617 | Mr Kit Parkinson | Counter-Objection | Boundary | |
Mr Kit ParkinsonCounter-Objection
Manukau East
Relates to objectionsN20-003
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Mr Kit ParkinsonLabour's map separates Mt Wellington and worse, it's according to random mesh-blocks rather than communities of interest. Their map cuts along Penrose Road and creates an awkward boundary in and out of side streets off Penrose Road. Several streets, including Penrose Road, Panorama, Mt Wellington Highway and Barrack Road are split and will be in two different electorates. I own three properties in Mt Wellington, but under Labour's proposal they will be in different electorates, even though they are the same suburb. This is absurd. The better solution is separating the proposed Maungakiekie and Manukau East electorates along the Mt Wellington rail line as originally proposed.Suggested solutionKeep the boundary line as the Mt Wellington Railway line, which acts as a natural boundary. |
||||
N20-618 | Kit Parkinson | Counter-Objection | Boundary | |
Kit ParkinsonCounter-Objection
Manukau East
Relates to objectionsN20-032 , N20-061, N20-029, N20-062, N20-013, N20-051, N20-048, N20-005, N20-014, N20-015, N20-016, N20-019, N20-018, N20-020, N20-021, N20-022, N20-023, N20-026, N20-024, N20-063, N20-030, N20-031, N20-001, N20-056, N20-002, N20-035, N20-040, N20-041, N20-004, N20-058, N20-059, N20-045, N20-046, N20-049, N20-047, N20-050, N20-052, N20-007, N20-008, N20-055, N20-057, N20-027, N20-010, N20-009
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Kit ParkinsonThe argument that Panmure has no history or common interest with Manukau East is resolved changing the proposed Manukau East electorate name to a name that reflects the communities in the new boundary. These could be: "Otahuhu" which is the middle joining suburb between the original Manukau East communities and the proposed new ones; or "Panmure-Otara"Suggested solutionrename the new Manukau East electorate |
||||
N20-619 | Kit Parkinson | Counter-Objection | Boundary | |
Kit ParkinsonCounter-Objection
Manukau East
Relates to objectionsN20-051, N20-054, N20-058
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Kit ParkinsonSubmissions regarding home values decreasing is irrelevant and nonsensical as home values are not based on electorates in which the house resides in, but an array of factors including location near schools, job opportunities, neighbouring prices, home size and usable space, age and condition. Electorates are not mentioned anywhere on the listings/property descriptions on Trademe Property, One Roof or QV. |
||||
N20-620 | Kit Parkinson | Counter-Objection | Boundary | |
Kit ParkinsonCounter-Objection
Manukau East
Relates to objectionsN20-006, N20-039, N20-055
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Kit ParkinsonWe are currently going through the consultation process now, which is the point of the submissions and counter-submissions process. This process is the standard process that has been adopted for all previous boundary changes. |
||||
N20-621 | Kit Parkinson | Counter-Objection | Boundary | |
Kit ParkinsonCounter-Objection
Manukau East
Relates to objectionsN20-006, N20-007, N20-009, N20-033, N20-036, N20-037, N20-038, N20-047
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Kit ParkinsonDue to population growth, there needs to be some cutting of suburbs along the eastern side, therefore the Mt Wellington Railway Line is a better natural boundary than the Tamaki Estuary. The Tamaki Estuary does extend all the way down to Otahuhu and I note parts of Manukau East currently includes the Estuary |
||||
N20-622 | Mrs Violetta Petersen-Lesatele | Counter-Objection | Boundary, name | |
Mrs Violetta Petersen-LesateleCounter-Objection
Manukau East
Relates to objectionsN20-003
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection relates to a name change
Mrs Violetta Petersen-LesateleLabour's map horribly splits Mt Wellington. Their map cuts along Penrose Road and creates an awkward boundary in and out of side streets. Several streets, including Penrose Road, Panorama, Mt Wellington Highway and Barrack Road are split and will be in two different electorates. The better solution is separating the proposed Maungakiekie and Manukau East electorates along the Mt Wellington rail line. Labour's proposal also splits Mt Wellington from its maunga. As a Mt Wellington resident for over 40 years, I have not been in an electorate where my community is separated from our maunga. Mt Wellington has always historically been in Maungakiekie, unlike Panmure and Point England.Suggested solutionKeep the boundary line as the Mt Wellington Railway line, which acts as a natural boundary. |
||||
N20-623 | Mrs Violetta Petersen-Lesaetele | Counter-Objection | Boundary, name | |
Mrs Violetta Petersen-LesaeteleCounter-Objection
Manukau East
Relates to objectionsN20-032 , N20-061, N20-029, N20-062, N20-013, N20-051, N20-043, N20-048, N20-005, N20-014, N20-015, N20-016, N20-019, N20-018, N20-020, N20-021, N20-022, N20-023, N20-026, N20-024, N20-063, N20-030, N20-031, N20-001, N20-056, N20-002, N20-035, N20-038, N20-039, N20-040, N20-041, N20-004, N20-058, N20-059, N20-045, N20-046, N20-049, N20-047, N20-050, N20-052, N20-007, N20-008, N20-055, N20-057, N20-027, N20-010, N20-009
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection relates to a name change
Mrs Violetta Petersen-LesaeteleThe argument that Panmure has no history or common interest with Manukau East is resolved changing the proposed Manukau East electorate name to a name that reflects the communities in the new boundary. These could be: "Otahuhu" which is the middle joining suburb between the original Manukau East communities and the proposed new ones; or Panmure-Otara. Mt Wellington Railway Line also forms a natural boundary.Suggested solutionRename the new Manukau East electorate |
||||
N20-624 | Mrs Violetta Petersen-Lesatele | Counter-Objection | Boundary | |
Mrs Violetta Petersen-LesateleCounter-Objection
Manukau East
Relates to objectionsN20-047, N20-051
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Mrs Violetta Petersen-LesateleMaungakiekie is named after the maunga “One Tree Hill”, not “Maungarei” (Mt Wellington). Maungarei is in Mt Wellington and Mt Wellington is in the Commission’s proposed Maungakiekie electorate. Island Child submission: Maybury Street is in Tamaki electorate. Agree shouldn’t be called Manukau East, it should be called something else. |
||||
N20-625 | Mrs Violetta Petersen-Lesatele | Counter-Objection | Boundary, name | |
Mrs Violetta Petersen-LesateleCounter-Objection
Manukau East
Relates to objectionsN20-002, N20-003, N20-008, N20-009, N20-020, N20-026, N20-029, N20-030, N20-039, N20-040, N20-041, N20-042, N20-043, N20-045, N20-046, N20-049, N20-050, N20-055, N20-058
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection relates to a name change
Mrs Violetta Petersen-LesatelePanmure and Mt Wellington have previously been in different electorates, for example in prior to the 2006 boundary review, Panmure was in Tamakiand Mt Wellington was in Maungakiekie. Maungarei has never not been in the Maungakiekie electorate, except when it was in the old Panmure electorate when Maungakiekie didn’t exist. Therefore, it would be extremely out of order to move Maungarei out of Maungakiekie. As a Mt Wellington resident for over 40+ years and like many other Mt Wellington residents this would create a disconnect and a loss of identify for our community. Mt Wellington is a thriving community and it has enormous potential. Our identity, history and future is connected to our maunga of which Maungakiekie is very much part of. Suggested solutionKeep the boundary line as per the Commission's Report which is the Mt Wellington Railway Line. |
||||
N20-626 | Mr Russell Grainger | Counter-Objection | Boundary | |
Mr Russell GraingerCounter-Objection
Manukau East
Relates to objectionsN20-003
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change
Mr Russell GraingerThis submission's map greatly divides Mt Wellington. According to the submitter, half of Mt Wellington should be in Manukau East while half should be in Maungakiekie. Some residents will be seperated from their maunga. The suggested map cuts along Penrose Road and creates a nonsensical boundary. There will be several streets where residents on the same street will be in different electorates. Tight communities of interest will be separated. The better solution is to keep the Mt Wellington Rail Line as the natural boundary between the proposed Maungakiekie and Manukau East electorates.Suggested solutionKeep the boundary line as the Mt Wellington Railway line, which acts as a natural boundary. |