View submissions

Counter-Objection

Relates to objections

N20-002, N20-005, N20-007, N20-009, N20-014, N20-020, N20-026, N20-028, N20-030, N20-034, N20-039, N20-040, N20-041, N20-043, N20-045, N20-046, N20-049, N20-051, N20-055, N20-059, N20-062

---

Ms Bevan Chuang

The claim that Panmure will not be properly represented and its issues not listened to cannot be possibly made as representation is determined by the elected MP for the new seat. There is no telling where that new MP will decide to locate their office or what sort of representative that member of parliament will be

Counter-Objection

Relates to objections

N20-001, N20-005, N20-007, N20-009, N20-010, N20-011, N20-015, N20-016, N20-020, N20-023, N20-026, N20-028, N20-029, N20-030, N20-039, N20-040, N20-041, N20-042, N20-043, N20-044, N20-045, N20-046, N20-049, N20-050, N20-051, N20-052, N20-055, N20-058

---

Debbie Burrows

Submissions that reference TRC and it's change in population/connection to Panmure.
Similar large-scale developments to TRC are also occurring in the Maungakiekie suburbs of Oranga and Onehunga. These developments by Kainga Ora will also see additional population increases, so the proposed Maungakiekie electorate cannot have three major population increasing developments when the purpose of boundary reviews is to make sure electorates are proportional. Note, not only an issue for Panmure, there’s large-scale developments all over Auckland you cannot hold up boundary changes because of current developments, because then changes based on population will never occur.

Counter-Objection

Relates to objections

N20-002, N20-005, N20-007, N20-009, N20-014, N20-020, N20-026, N20-028, N20-030, N20-034, N20-039, N20-040, N20-041, N20-043, N20-045, N20-046, N20-049, N20-051, N20-055, N20-059, N20-062

---

Debbie Burrows

Submissions that reference Panmure will not be properly represented in the new electorate.
The claim that Panmure will not be properly represented and its issues not listened to cannot be possibly made. Representation is determined by the elected MP for the new seat, and there is no telling at this point in time where that new MP will decide to locate their office or what sort of representative member of parliament they will be.

Counter-Objection

Relates to objections

N20-001, N20-002, N20-003, N20-009, N20-010, N20-011, N20-016, N20-020, N20-023, N20-026, N20-029, N20-030, N20-034, N20-036, N20-039, N20-040, N20-041, N20-043, N20-045, N20-046, N20-047, N20-048, N20-049, N20-051, N20-052, N20-055, N20-058, N20-064

---

Sunny Kaushal

Counter-submission (1): Labour Party Counter-Submission N20-003
Objection and reason: Labour's suggested boundary splits Mt Wellington. Their map cuts along Penrose Road and moves in and out of side streets, cutting multiple streets in half (between two different electorates) according to random mesh-blocks rather than communities of interest. These streets include: Penrose Road, Panorama Road, Barrack Road, Mt Wellington Highway. The more straight-forward solution is separating the proposed Maungakiekie and Manukau East electorates along the rail line as per the Commission’s draft. This line acts as a natural boundary. Mt Wellington has historically been in the Maungakiekie electorate, unlike Panmure and Point England.

Counter-submission (2): submissions that reference the separation of the Panmure train station from the Panmure community.
Objection and reason: Object to the notion that Panmure will be separated from it's train station and therefore should not be subject to change. There are several examples where a community’s main train station/transport hub is in a different electorate to the one they reside in. One example includes Otahuhu Train Station, which is in the current Mangere electorate (Otahuhu is currently split between Maungakiekie and Manukau East).

Counter-submission (3): submissions that reference the new Manukau East electorate's shape is impractical
Objection and Reason: The claim that the new Manukau East electorate is impractical because of its shape is irrelevant. Many electorates come in various shapes and sizes as they are based on population numbers i.e. proposed North Shore electorate (approx. 12-14km) from Mairangi Bay down to Devonport. This new electorate also has a basin in the middle like the proposed Manukau East electorate. Proportionate electorates is the utmost important factor - not the shape of the new electorate.

Counter-Objection

Relates to objections

N20-032 , N20-061, N20-029, N20-062, N20-013, N20-051, N20-043, N20-048, N20-005, N20-014, N20-015, N20-016, N20-019, N20-018, N20-020, N20-021, N20-022, N20-023, N20-026, N20-024, N20-063, N20-030, N20-031, N20-001, N20-056, N20-002, N20-035, N20-038, N20-039, N20-040, N20-041, N20-004, N20-058, N20-059, N20-045, N20-046, N20-049, N20-047, N20-050, N20-052, N20-007, N20-008, N20-055, N20-057, N20-027, N20-010, N20-009

---

Mr Shiu Narayan

Change the proposed Manukau East electorate name to one that reflects the communities in the new boundary i.e. "Panmure-Otahuhu", or a name that references/relates to the Tamaki Estuary as this Estuary holds significance to the communities in the new Manukau East electorate. Renaming is a way all communities will have an identity in the new area.