View submissions

Select filters to view submissions

Displaying 401 - 410 of 438
Number Name Submission Change type View
S15-007 Mrs Rachel Rose Objection Boundary

Mrs Rachel Rose


Objection

Clutha-Southland
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mrs Rachel Rose

Queenstown Lakes needs it’s own boundary. Our population has increased significantly and the challenges that we face differ greatly to the rest of the Clutha region. I lived in the Far North where Whangarei had its own electorate. Queenstown needs it’s own MP. As an HR manager in a tourism company and a volunteer at CAB I see the requirements for a local MP every day. Our current MP does his best but he is too stretched.

Suggested solution

Queenstown Lakes electorate
S15-008 Councillor John MacDonald Objection Boundary

Councillor John MacDonald


Objection

Clutha-Southland
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Councillor John MacDonald

It is crazy that the Queenstown Lakes District and surrounding high growth tourism destinations are split up when there is a logical grouping that should have its own representation in Wellington.

Suggested solution

A new electorate that includes Wanaka, Cromwell, Queenstown, Te Anau and Milford Sound and probably Alexandra and redraw Waitaki and Clutha.
S15-009 David O'Brien Objection Boundary

David O'Brien


Objection

Clutha-Southland
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

David O'Brien

The proposed changes in Central Otago with include some areas, as published, being moved to Clutha Southland do simply not make sense from all perspectives.
People in Wellington should probably have a quick look at the map to understand how ridiculous this move would be.
S15-010 Mrs Nicky Busst Objection Boundary

Mrs Nicky Busst


Objection

Clutha-Southland
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mrs Nicky Busst

I couldn't even drop down our district as wouldnt know. As an International destination and a huge economic resource to the NZ economy Southern Lakes needs its own electorate and nit be grouped into an agricultural farming area.

Suggested solution

Southern Lakes be its own constituency
S15-011 Mrs Kathleen Baff Objection Boundary

Mrs Kathleen Baff


Objection

Clutha-Southland
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mrs Kathleen Baff

Splitting the Balclutha area into three separate electorates of Clutha-Southland (current), Invercargill and Dunedin-South, would be detrimental. Balclutha encompasses a solid collective of communities within a variety of towns and rural settlements. For Balclutha to be removed from its name-sake “Clutha”, split 3-ways and be latched onto the edge of the more urban zone of Dunedin-South, would segregate this close-knit community. The dynamics, infrastructure and priorities for the rural areas, settlements and towns of Balclutha and the Clutha District are different to those of Dunedin-South. Balclutha area would lose its sense of cohesion and identiy if it was split into three different Electorates. Balclutha has different priorities, interests, culture and well outside the location of Dunedin-South. Also proposing Owaka to be transfrerred to Invercargill, would break up another close-knit coastal community (from very nearby Kaka Point and Baclutha).
Moving Balclutha out of Clutha-Southland and then adding Roxburgh and Alexandra in to balance the numbers, appears more like “robbing Peter to pay Paul”. Balclutha is in Clutha, which is in South Otago, and South Otago is in Clutha-Southland where it should remain. The natural Clutha/Dunedin boundary is the Waipori River, which is exactly where Clutha-Southland and Dunedin-South “borders” currently are. Balclutha is in Clutha, which is in South Otago, and South Otago is in Clutha-Southland where it should remain.

Suggested solution

Clutha-Southland to remain unchanged except to perhaps give Invercargill a new northern boundary or, say, Tautuku River, if that settlement is happy. This would ensure Owaka remains past of Clutha-Southland (Balclutha). Westwards, the Clutha-Southland electorate would stop at the Beaumont River - leaving the (repairs for) the Beaumont bridge in its current (Waitaki) electorate. For example, and only as suggestions; Riverton, Tuatapere and Night Caps. Again, the people in these towns would need to put forward their own submissions on the matter.
Roxburgh and Alexandra would be great to have in Clutha-Southland but that decision is up for their own submissions.
S15-012 Mitzi Cole Bailey Objection Boundary

Mitzi Cole Bailey


Objection

Clutha-Southland
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mitzi Cole Bailey

New electorate boundaries

Suggested solution

Could Queenstown Te anau etc become its own electorate
S15-013 Mr Benjamin Chapman Objection Boundary

Mr Benjamin Chapman


Objection

Clutha-Southland
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mr Benjamin Chapman

The area affectionately known as The Southern Lakes, and to a broader extent the region east of the Southern Alps from Lake Te Anau north to Lake Tekapo and boarded by State Highway 8 (including the regions of Wakatipu, Wanaka, Hawea, Ohau and Pukaki) are a consistent offering of lake and alpine environments that would benefit if in an inclusive electoral region. This 'Lakes District' in its entirety is an as yet unappreciated greater region of natural and economic significance to New Zealand.

Suggested solution

That this wider region of the 'Lakes District' should be removed from their current electoral regions in which they lie. The current maps are dysfunctional, with the 'Lakes District' natural and economic significance being incompatible with that of the dominant primary industries of Clutha-Southland and Waitaki.
A 'Lakes District' electoral region would ensure the regions collective and aligned interests would be championed appropriately.
S15-014 Ms Amy Pearl Objection Boundary

Ms Amy Pearl


Objection

Clutha-Southland
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Ms Amy Pearl

http://www.scene.co.nz/opinion/boundaries-that-divide-us/ ~ This link sets all that out. I agree with the opinion in it & for all the reasons stated in it
There’s no pointy in us (In wanaka) being in the Clutha-Southland, it’s like being in the Waitaki. We lose as does government. Culturally, economically & environmentally the area is just too diverse & we don’t have representation.

Suggested solution

As above I support a Fiordland - Queenstown - Wanaka to Alexandra Electorate. A Southern Lakes. Is where we all fit.
S15-015 Mr Dominic Tay Objection Boundary, name

Mr Dominic Tay


Objection

Clutha-Southland
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection relates to a name change

Mr Dominic Tay

The Queenstown Lakes District Council area is divided across two large electorates. Given that this area is predicted to be a high-growth area, it would be sensible to consider uniting this community of interest into a single electorate.
With or without my proposed changes, the loss of Balclutha to Dunedin South means that the name for this electorate is no longer suitable.

Suggested solution

I recommend the transfer of the communities around Wanaka, Arrowtown and Lake Hawea into Clutha-Southland so the electorate aligns with the Queenstown Lakes District Council boundary.
If a consequential population loss is required, I recommend either:
• returning the communities around Clyde, Alexandra and Roxburgh from Clutha-Southland to Waitaki;
• transferring these same communities from Clutha-Southland to Dunedin South; or
• transferring the balance of the Clutha District from Clutha-Southland to Dunedin South (preferred).
With or without my proposed changes, the loss of Balclutha to Dunedin South means that the name for this electorate is no longer suitable. Options for names could include 'Milford', 'Wakatipu' (preferred) or 'Southern Lakes'.
S15-016 Michael Clark Objection Boundary, name

Michael Clark


Objection

Clutha-Southland
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection relates to a name change

Michael Clark

Being a resident in the Queenstown Area, I would like to make some suggestions regarding the boundary adjustments to Clutha and Southland.
- The Tourist industry needs a member a parliament that is fine tuned to the requirements of the industry.
- Adjusting the Clutha – Southland boundary in such a way that the area takes in all of the southern lakes, would define the area by its main industry.
- This would give the area its name.
- Include Te Anau through to Lake Hawea, the northern boundary being Haast. Include Alexandra Clyde and Cromwell.
- Take out of this district, the farming area of south Otago and Northern Southland. The boundary being the Five rivers turnoff through to Mossburn.
- The MP that would represent this area would be in tune to the requirements of other key Tourism areas in the country, and would be the logical candidate for the minister of tourism.
- Even if the numbers don’t quite add up now by excluding the farming community, this area is growing that fast, it soon will be of size.
- This area has issues that are not being dealt with because the present MP is being spread over a huge area.
- Can you please have another look at the boundaries around the Clutha Southland area, and see if this is possible. Keeping in mind, sooner than later Queenstown and Wanaka will be around the 60000 residents mark.
- For a major part of the year this area must have a population that is close to 60000 now when you count the tourists.
Back to top