View submissions

Select filters to view submissions

Displaying 301 - 330 of 438
Number Name Submission Change type View
N29-005 Mr Tom Kennerley Objection Boundary

Mr Tom Kennerley


Objection

Coromandel
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mr Tom Kennerley

I do not believe the Omokoroa Peninsula (Omokoroa Beach) should be moved from Bay of Plenty into Coromandel.
There is absolutely no association between Omokoroa and the Coromandel region. Omokoroa is, and always has been, closely aligned with the city of Tauranga given its very close proximity. Omokoroa, in my opinion, should be linked with Tauranga so being part of the Bay of Plenty was bad enough. Now being taken out of the "Bay of Plenty" altogether is absurd.

Suggested solution

Leave Omokoroa in the Bay of Plenty region and find another area of the Bay of Plenty to re-allocate to another electorate.
N29-006 Mr Hamish Morris Objection Boundary

Mr Hamish Morris


Objection

Coromandel
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mr Hamish Morris

I live in the Bay of Plenty not the Coromandel! Our member represents our area well and I don not believe we should incorporated into the Coromandel who have very different needs than ours.

Suggested solution

Split the Bay of Plenty into 2 electorates. East and west.
N29-007 Mrs Wendy Galloway Objection Boundary

Mrs Wendy Galloway


Objection

Coromandel
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mrs Wendy Galloway

Our Area which is 21km from the centre of Tauranga, a mixture of suburban and rural, it is proposed that this electrate Bay of Plenty be put in Coromandel for the next election. Most people regard Thames as the start of the Coromandel. That is at least 102km, meaning a journey of 1 1/2 hours. I have talked to people in Omokoroa, some have never been to Thames we are now hearing Omokoroa is a suburb of Tauranga. When we first here from Auckland early this century we were in Coromandel electorate, but it was decided that we should be included in Bay of Plenty. The sea in front of Omokoroa is the Bay of Plenty not Firth of Thames

Suggested solution

LEAVE AS IS.
N30-001 Mayor Garry Webber, Western Bay of Plenty District Council Objection Name

Mayor Garry Webber, Western Bay of Plenty District Council


Objection

Bay of Plenty
This objection does not relate to a boundary change
This objection relates to a name change

Mayor Garry Webber, Western Bay of Plenty District Council

By using "Bay of Plenty" as the name for this electorate is a gross misnomer as there are many electorates that make up the Bay of Plenty Province.

Suggested solution

The name I propose for the new electorate that surrounds Tauranga City is "Tauranga Moana" as that is the name that is commonly used for it. Furthermore that is also the Te Reo name for the area.
Additionally by having Tauranga City and Tauranga Moana as the names of the two adjoining electorates everyone will recognise them.
N33-001 Dan Williams Objection Boundary

Dan Williams


Objection

East Coast
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Dan Williams

When setting electoral boundaries. Why don’t you start with the large geographical areas This may stop the ridiculous boundary we have (in the Gisborne area) between the east coast electorate and the Napier Electorate.
I know of someone inland from TeKaraka who had to pass the east coast electorate in Te Karaka to find a Napier electorate booth.
N34-001 Allan Chesswas and Neil Walker Objection Boundary

Allan Chesswas and Neil Walker


Objection

Taranaki-King Country
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Allan Chesswas and Neil Walker

Please consider our objection to the proposed electoral boundaries below. I have also attached an objection I made at the previous boundary review, which goes into some detail about options for alternative boundaries. I do hope though that in 2019/2020 the entire Stratford district will be able to be pulled together into the Whanganui electorate, which is an easy option for delineating the new boundary.
We would like to make an objection to the proposed electoral boundaries, noting that the boundaries which changed at the last election split rural Stratford from urban Stratford, whereas the whole community is interdependent together in the Stratford District under one territorial authority, and the Stratford township serves as the urban service centre for the wider community. This split makes it very difficult for political institutions to function effectively, without having the same member representing the community in the house. The closest Taranaki King Country electorate office is in Inglewood, 20 minutes north of Stratford, and we have to drive through Stratford to get there. Meanwhile the MP for Whanganui has an electorate office in Stratford.
I note that the populations for each electorate are similar (Taranaki-King Country 63,450, and Whanganui 64,175), but the Taranaki-King Country electorate is projected to grow by 3,125 to 67,300 by 2023, whereas the Whanganui electorate is only projected to grow by 25 to 64,200. This means that the Whanganui Electorate is way below tolerance in 2023 at -9%, which is outside the rules set by Parliament and leaves the electorate population much lower than it should be.
The population of Stratford District that aren’t currently included in the Whanganui electorate would be around 1000 – 1500 based on ward statistics I have seen from past censuses. Shifting this population to join its urban Stratford counterpart in the Whanganui electorate would mean that populations for each electorate would be much more similar and much closer to quota in 2023, and would mean that whole Stratford community would have better integrity at both this election and the next.
If including the entire Stratford rural ward population is considered too many people, there are other alternatives to include smaller portions of the district, which were outlined in an objection submitted by Allan Chesswas in the 2014 review. This earlier objection is attatched for your information.
N34-002 Mr Peter Ferris Objection Boundary

Mr Peter Ferris


Objection

Taranaki-King Country
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mr Peter Ferris

Firstly, it is inappropriate and irrelevant to be represented by some stranger (I have never met the person) in a different part of the country. That's not Democracy, it is autocratic convenience and it is not acceptable to me
Secondly, how does this person keep informed of my local issues and be available to me in person should the need arise. They naturally are locationally advantaging those who are in a reasonable proximity to their seat. I feel we are just orphan add ons to make up the numbers. Surely it is better to have much closer representation to where I live. That I feel is my democratic right.
N34-003 Mrs Vivienne Ferris Objection Boundary

Mrs Vivienne Ferris


Objection

Taranaki-King Country
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mrs Vivienne Ferris

I live on the outskirts of Hamilton. It is ridiculous to have my MP based in New Plymouth. I wish to be counted in Hamilton or Waikato. My address is RD9 HAMILTON. Nowhere near New Plymouth. I do not want to vote if my vote is counted in New Plymouth.

Suggested solution

The Hamilton or Waikato boundaries should include those of us who live in those areas.
N34-601 Jenny Sargent Counter-Objection Boundary

Jenny Sargent


Counter-Objection

Taranaki-King Country

Relates to objections

N34-002, N34-003
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Jenny Sargent

I live at Waingaro Rd, Ngaruawahia 3720 (15mins drive from Hamilton) & this puts me under Taranaki-King Country electorate (special vote as I’m too far away to a voting booth for this area)! When across the Rd from me, my neighbours are under the Waikato electorate. Are we serious? This is just crazy & not to mention very disappointing as I only have the choices for Taranaki-King Country candidates! Who are they?.......we never know because we never see or hear from anyone in that area & do they represent me, my area? No they don’t. I live in the Waikato, pay rates to Waikato Regional Council & only Waikato area candidates visit the area & send out election material via mail. I believe I’m late in submitting my request however Waingaro Rd needs to be reviewed, the boundary needs to be changed & Waingaro Rd should be under Waikato. It will be extremely disappointing if this area is not reviewed & changed.....what will be the point in taking any interest in politics if I’m not able to vote for people in my area who actually represent me.
N39-001 Mr Bevin Thirkell Objection Boundary

Mr Bevin Thirkell


Objection

Rangit_kei
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mr Bevin Thirkell

We live in palmerston north, however the boundary of the Palmerston North / Rangitikei Electorate runs down the middle of James line putting our half of the street in an electorate that is irrelevant to us.

Suggested solution

Move the palmerston north electorate to include all of James Line & Lorenzo Place
N42-001 Liam McLeavey Objection Name

Liam McLeavey


Objection

Ōtaki
This objection does not relate to a boundary change
This objection relates to a name change

Liam McLeavey

I believe that the Otaki electorate should be renamed the Horowhenua-Kapiti Electorate.
In terms of communities, Otaki is a small town in the middle of the Otaki Electorate. When people think of Otaki Electorate, they immediately just think of the town Otaki, not all of the other communities the Electorate represents like Paraparaumu, Waikane, Levin and Foxton.
Residents of all of the communities would feel that the name Horowhenua-Kapiti would better reflect our communities, but also the great partnership between our communities that does actually occur. There is already successful precedence for the use of the word Horowhenua-Kapiti, for example, Horowhenua-Kapiti Rugby Union and the Horowhenua-Kapiti Business Awards.
Thank you for taking the time to read and consider my objection.
N42-002 Mrs Wendy Shipman Objection Boundary

Mrs Wendy Shipman


Objection

Ōtaki
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mrs Wendy Shipman

I live in Menin Road, Raumati Beach. Raumati Beach is divided into two electorates Porirua and Otaki. I find it ludacris and isolating for our community that general election boundaries divide our community when decision making for our area is primarily governed by the Otaki electorate.

Suggested solution

Include the Southern part of Raumati up to the boundary of Queen Elizabeth in the Otaki Electorate. It is a natural physical boundary that would benefit the greater Kapiti Coast area which is a long coastal strip of land.
N42-601 Lynette Ellison Counter-Objection Name

Lynette Ellison


Counter-Objection

Ōtaki

Relates to objections

N42-001
This objection does not relate to a boundary change
This objection relates to a name change

Lynette Ellison

Otaki - is not representative of the area. A small town in the middle of Raumati South - Foxton a two hour drive.

Suggested solution

I would like to propose the electorate be named Horowhenua-Kapiti
N43-001 Mrs Rosemary Young Objection Boundary

Mrs Rosemary Young


Objection

Wairarapa
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mrs Rosemary Young

Waiarapa Electorate covers an area of 3 Regional Councils. Wellington in the South, Horizons in part of the middle and Hawkes Bay in the North.
How can an area so large have "Communities of mutual interest" ?
The Waiarapa M.P. is based approx 2 hours away in Masterton, and the Tukituki M.P. is based 45 Mins away in Hastings, from the 2 main towns of Central Hawkes Bay.

Suggested solution

The part of the electorate that is in Hawkes Bay Regional Council be returned to the Tukituki electorate.
Currently, Central Hawkes Bay District (own council) is split into 2 electorates, which is not satisfactory.
This change may be within the 5% threshold.
N43-002 Mr Dean Hyde Objection Boundary

Mr Dean Hyde


Objection

Wairarapa
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mr Dean Hyde

Placement of the township of Waipawa into the Tuki Tuki electorate.

Suggested solution

Leave Waipawa in the Wairarapa electorate.
N43-601 Kieran McAnulty MP and Mayor Alex Walker Counter-Objection Boundary, name

Kieran McAnulty MP and Mayor Alex Walker


Counter-Objection

Wairarapa

Relates to objections

N43-001, N43-002
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection relates to a name change

Kieran McAnulty MP and Mayor Alex Walker

Please find attached a letter jointly signed by Kieran McAnulty, Labour List MP based in Wairarapa, and Alex Walker, Mayor, Central Hawke’s Bay Council.
The attached letter makes the case for the Wairarapa electorate to be re-named to include reference to Central Hawke’s Bay.
The submissions N43-1 and N43-2 express contradictory positions over the question of the inclusion of Central Hawke’s Bay in the Wairarapa electorate with one arguing for continued inclusion (N43-2) and the other suggesting merger with Tukituki (N43-1). This difference of opinion is likely more widely spread as it reflects the fundamental question as to why Central Hawkes Bay is within the boundaries of the electorate but not embraced within its official name. These concerns may well be met and resolved if the submission of Mr McAnulty and Ms Walker on changing the name were to be adopted.
N45-001 Mr Oliver Sangster Objection Name

Mr Oliver Sangster


Objection

Remutaka
This objection does not relate to a boundary change
This objection relates to a name change

Mr Oliver Sangster

Not an objection. I wish to express support for the proposed name change of this electorate for the reason given in the Representation Commission report.

Suggested solution

N.A. Agree with the proposed change.
N46-001 Mike Fryer Objection Boundary

Mike Fryer


Objection

Ōhāriu
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mike Fryer

I recommend that Wadestown be moved back to Wellington Central, as it retains a stronger community of interest with that area. This should be manageable by adjusting the boundary between Ohariu and Mana.
N46-002 Mr Dominic Tay Objection Boundary

Mr Dominic Tay


Objection

Ōhāriu
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mr Dominic Tay

The north Wellington suburbs of Linden, Lindenvale and Greenacres are closely connected with the suburb of Tawa, and all part of the Tawa Community Board area. This is a distinct community within Wellington City and has its own community board (one of only two in the Wellington City Council area). However, Linden, Lindenvale and Greenacres are in the Mana electorate while Tawa and the remainder of northern Wellington are in Ōhāriu.
Although this boundary has existed continuously since at least 2007, uniting the Tawa Community into a single electorate would align with the 'communities of interest' principle.

Suggested solution

Ōhāriu as proposed is slightly below quota and Mana as proposed is slightly above quota. I recommend aligning the boundary between Ōhāriu and Mana with the boundary between the Wellington City Council and Porirua City Council areas - transferring Linden, Lindenvale and Greenacres into Ōhāriu.
N47-001 Zoe Carew Objection Name

Zoe Carew


Objection

Hutt South
This objection does not relate to a boundary change
This objection relates to a name change

Zoe Carew

Hutt South is an artificial name. I've never heard it used except for the electorate.

Suggested solution

I think we should use the common, beautiful name: Te Awakairangi.
N47-601 Max Shierlaw Counter-Objection Name

Max Shierlaw


Counter-Objection

Hutt South

Relates to objections

N47-001
This objection does not relate to a boundary change
This objection relates to a name change

Max Shierlaw

Te Awaikairangi is a name used for the entire Hutt Valley and is not specific to Lower Hutt. For example Awaikairangi Park is in Upper Hutt which is the present Rimutaka electorate. If the electorate name is to be changed to a Maori name then the local Iwi and Rununga should be proposing the change. The electorate's name should not be changed on the basis of a single objection to a Representation Review.

Suggested solution

Perhaps change the electorate's name to "Lower Hutt South" to reflect the legal name of the City. "Hutt" is only the legal name for the local Council. While the electorate doesn't encompass the entire City, it is made up entirely of parts of Lower Hutt City.
N48-001 Robert Davies Objection Boundary

Robert Davies


Objection

Wellington Central
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Robert Davies

The dividing line between Wellington Central and Ohariu cuts through Wilton. I think this is against your general policy and caused problems for one of the candidates last election. Have attached map showing Wilton Boundaries (as of a few years back but I don't think it has changed).

Suggested solution

Put all of Wilton into Wellington Central
N48-601 Mr John Plunkett Counter-Objection Boundary

Mr John Plunkett


Counter-Objection

Wellington Central

Relates to objections

N48-001
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mr John Plunkett

I have lived in the Electorate for the majority of my life and the local people are aware of the boundaries and how they fit in the local region.
The boundaries are within the population tolerance and should not change.
The election is in less than nine months potentially and making a change like this could disenfranchise local voters which is not necessary.
The Wilton suburb is firmly in the Wellington Central Electorate and the current boundary is sufficient to provide separation between Wilton and Wadestown.

Suggested solution

Leave the boundaries for Ohariu as they are currently drawn
N49-001 Siri Shannon Objection Boundary

Siri Shannon


Objection

Rongotai
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Siri Shannon

I would like to lodge an objection to the boundary between Rongotai and Wellington Central along Adelaide road in Mount Cook. In the local body elections this area was able to vote in the Lambton ward. A person may live on this section of Adelaide road and yet never set foot in Newtown. It makes more sense for the Rongotai electorate to be east of the tunnel, and begin at the north end of Riddiford Street.
S02-001 Mr Chris Geddes Objection Boundary

Mr Chris Geddes


Objection

West Coast-Tasman
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mr Chris Geddes

Here goes a spanner in the works! The West Coast-Tasman electorate is the second largest in the country by area, and the largest in distance (from one end to the other.)
It is also fragmented - the southern alps slices the electorate in two. There is absolutely no commonality of interest between the West Coast and the Tasman District. Coasters travel to Christchurch and its environs more frequently for business and supplies than they do to Tasman. The West Coast mail and courier services are all serviced from Christchurch, the trains connect the West Coast to Christchurch, our fuel comes from Christchurch as does the majority of our foodstuff supplies. Hokitika Airport connects to Christchurch. In short, notwithstanding that the West Coast is still separated from Canterbury by the southern alps, that is the area with which we have a commonality of interest. Medical evacuations from the Coast invariably cross to Christchurch - although Nelson has excellent local infrastructure it is considered just too remote to be of much interest or service to Coasters.
The Coast is poorly represented as a result of this historic anomaly. Our local MP lives in the northern end of the electorate at present, and seldom visits the coast. I do not blame him for ignoring the Coast, it is just too bloody difficult for him to get here. To visit the coast he may be lucky enough to get the early bird from Nelson to Christchurch, then another flight to Hokitika. But if he misses the early bird, then he must travel to Wellington first, then Christchurch before crossing to Hokitika, and then having to find his way north to the Greymouth RSA where he holds constituent clinics. The poor bugger arrives in Grey right on lunchtime, so unless he has packed a picnic lunch he does not begin to see constituents until 1:30-ish - then has to be back in Hokitika to get the last bird out at 5:30. Constituents are frustrated at the tyranny of distance - there would not be many locations in New Zealand where your local MP's office may be 500km's away through some of the most unforgiving terrain that our country has to offer.
Only yesterday I was talking to our local tyre merchant, he had just done a day trip to Christchurch to collect some stock, and when I asked him whether he considered purchasing stock from Nelson he replied that he was "not that brave or stupid."

Suggested solution

I would respectfully request that you consider pushing the electorate eastward over the alps rather than northward to Golden Bay. For the most populous areas of the coast Canterbury is far more accessible and accessed far more frequently than Tasman District. I would suggest drawing a line encompassing all of the West Coast, up the Grey Valley to Inangahua Junction (or even to Murchison) then across the alps to include a portion of west Canterbury.
I understand that this is a very challenging electorate for you to consider, but the West Coast has been forgotten for far too long and I believe it to be worthy of some consideration. Thank you for reading this far - Regards Chris Geddes
S02-002 Mrs Mary Lafrentz Objection Boundary

Mrs Mary Lafrentz


Objection

West Coast-Tasman
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mrs Mary Lafrentz

It is ridiculous to arrange boundaries to suit a population. These keep changing due to the climate, work and many other reasons. For one person to be able to bike around their area, and another need a whole day or more to get from one end to the other is unreasonable and does not provide fair representation to the larger area. West Coast is already a huge committment; to any member, to make it larger is manic.

Suggested solution

Leave the boundaries as they are or make the boundary of Nelson larger to take in the close communities south of the present boundary; that would not be as easier served by a member further away.
I have not researched the boundary to the south of West Coast. This may need a check also.
S02-003 Mr Philip de Weck Objection Boundary

Mr Philip de Weck


Objection

West Coast-Tasman
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mr Philip de Weck

Brightwater is essentially a dormitory township for Richmond and Nelson. Their interests, from a political view point, are those of the Nelson electorate. To remove them from this and arbitrarily place them in the West Coast electorate is a grave invasion of their democratic rights and a denial of their ability to be involved in local matters that may materially affect them. It is for these reasons that I strongly object to the proposal.
S02-004 Mr Bryan Scoles Objection Boundary

Mr Bryan Scoles


Objection

West Coast-Tasman
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mr Bryan Scoles

I am a Brightwater resident and object to be included within the Tasman-West Coast Electorate. I consider that my interests are better served by a Nelson located government representative. Given the geographic size of the Tasman-West Coast electorate I consider any specific issues that arose in Brightwater would just be lost to the other big issues that that region suffers from namely the economic decline and population that is occurring on the West Coast.
This proposed boundary change feels as though Brightwater residents views are being sacrificed just to make up the numbers for the population decline on the West Coast. This seems undemocratic.
I work in Richmond and a large number of Brightwater residents work in either Richmond and Nelson and therefore I consider that Brightwater has more connections to this electorate than the Tasman West Coast

Suggested solution

I suggest leaving the electorate boundaries as they are for this region. Although the changes are being undertaken for population reasons more consideration needs to considered for the geographic size of an electorate. Given the large size and geographic separation of the Tasman West Coast, it must be difficult for the representative to effectively get around that whole district to engage with its residents.
S02-005 Mrs Marissa Kerwin-Boulton Objection Boundary

Mrs Marissa Kerwin-Boulton


Objection

West Coast-Tasman
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Mrs Marissa Kerwin-Boulton

Don’t want to be changed to west coast electric - why vote for an electric area based three hours away?! when should be voting for Nelson where I actually spend my time & live my life!!!

Suggested solution

Don’t change the electric boundaries
S02-006 Vivienne Boulton Objection Boundary

Vivienne Boulton


Objection

West Coast-Tasman
This objection relates to a boundary change
This objection does not relate to a name change

Vivienne Boulton

Change from Nelson to West Coast electorate - not interested in this change as its not my district. Nelson is my lifestyle, want to vote for my lifestyle in my hometown region of Nelson.

Suggested solution

Don't change the voting boundaries for this region
Back to top